Abstract

The Small Punch (SP) test is a relatively simple test well suited for material ranking and material property estimation in situations where standard testing is not possible or considered too material consuming. The material tensile properties, e.g. the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and the proof strength are usually linearly correlated to the force-deflection behaviour of a SP test. However, if the test samples and test set-up dimensions are not according to standardized dimensions or the material ductility does not allow the SP sample to deform to the pre-defined displacements used in these correlations, the standard formulations can naturally not be used. Also, in cases where no supporting UTS data is available the applied correlation factors cannot be verified. In this paper a formulation is proposed that enables the estimation of UTS without supporting uniaxial tensile strength data for a range of materials, both for standard type and for curved (tube section) samples. The proposed equation was originally developed for estimating the equivalent stress in small punch creep but is also found to robustly estimate the UTS of several ductile ferritic, ferritic/martensitic and austenitic steels. It is also shown that the methodology can be further applied on non-standard test samples and test set-ups and to estimate the properties of less ductile materials such as 46% cold worked 15-15Ti cladding steel tubes. In the case of curved samples the UTS estimates have to be corrected for curvature to match the corresponding flat specimen behaviour. The geometrical correction factors are dependent on tube diameters and wall thicknesses and were determined by finite element simulations. The outcome of the testing and simulation work shows that the UTS can be robustly estimated both for flat samples as well as for thin walled tube samples. The usability of the SP testing and assessment method for estimating tensile strength of engineering steels in general and for nuclear claddings in specific has been verified.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIt has been shown to be a challenging task to estimate uniaxial (equivalent) stress from the force displacement curve of the Small Punch (SP) test [2,3]

  • In a small punch (SP) test the local stresses and strains are biaxial in nature [1]

  • Where Rm-UA is the uniaxial tensile strength, Rm-Small Punch (SP) the estimated ultimate tensile strength (UTS) calculated by the classical equation (CLA), Altstadt method (ALT) and Modified Chakrabarty (MCH) models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been shown to be a challenging task to estimate uniaxial (equivalent) stress from the force displacement curve of the SP test [2,3]. The new standard covers the classical Small Punch (SP) test for tensile property estimation and the Small Punch Creep (SPC) test for creep property evaluation. In this paper some new insight, gained from the SPC equivalent stress determination [6], is used for estimating the tensile strength. In the SP test a hemispherical punch or a ball is forced at a constant displacement rate through a disc specimen The main result of a SP test is the measured force F as a function of displacement v (at the punch tip) or deflection u (below the sample). The difference between displacement and deflection is the change of the specimen thickness at the punch tip

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call