Abstract

People with intellectual disability who possess expressive language are able to participate successfully in qualitative interviews, providing the facilitator pays close attention to their communication preferences. This article considers the successes and flaws in interviewing techniques utilised in a study that invited twelve men and 17 women to talk about sex, risk, social and leisure life. Questions were posed in plain language and accompanied by concrete reference tools, namely picture cards and photo-story vignettes. Adjusting the depth of questioning in line with what a respondent wants to or can offer enhanced the quality of data obtained. The discussion highlights that interviewer’s actions may contribute to errors, which have previously been described in individualising terms as acquiescence, recency and unresponsiveness. The overall message of this article is that a responsive approach to each participant’s particular communication style, combined with avoidance of inaccessible question formats,...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call