Abstract

This article described the implementation of an educational program to decrease provider ordering of computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) and encourage use of ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). The authors' impetus was a desire to decrease radiation exposure to patients, given that the radiation dose from CTPA is about five times greater than from V/Q scanning. Based on the literature, they argue that in most cases V/Q scans are as good as CTPA for detecting PE and thus should be preferred.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.