Abstract

The complexity of sustainable development and societal transitions require both analytical understandings of how coupled human-environment systems function and transdisciplinary science-to-practice approaches. The academic discourse has advanced in developing a framework for defining success in transdisciplinary research (TDR). Further empirical evidence is needed to validate the proposed concepts with TDR case studies. This paper applies a widely used TDR framework to test and critically evaluate its design principles and criteria of success with five TDR case studies the author is intimately familiar with. Overall, the design principles of the framework are validated for the five cases. Additional design principles are derived from the case analysis and proposed to complement the applied framework: (1) A project origin from society as opposed to with and for society; (2) Quickly available initiation funding; (3) Flexibility in time, objectives and methods throughout the research process; (4) Acceptance of process vs. project results; (5) Inclusion of public science communication; and (6) A demand-driven transition to a prolonged or new project partnership. The complementing principles are proposed for integration in the applied framework and are subject to further empirical testing. The reflexive empirical approach I have taken in this paper offers a key step towards removing institutional barriers for successful TDR, demonstrating how conceptual frameworks can be applied.

Highlights

  • IntroductionEmerging sustainability science can be subdivided into science for sustainability and science of sustainability [11]

  • I, the author, describe and analyze five transdisciplinary research (TDR) case studies that I led for the identification of progress and success factors, applying and evaluating the framework of [8]

  • I analyze each case in a way where the challenges throughout the research process, proposed solutions, and resulting criteria of success as published in [8] are matched and compared with the challenges experienced in the five TDR cases of this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Emerging sustainability science can be subdivided into science for sustainability and science of sustainability [11] The former is supposed to deliver answers to the pressing problems and societal challenges of today and tomorrow, such as climate change vulnerability, energy demand, and the provision of ecosystem services [8]. The latter is characterized as a rather monodisciplinary science that searches for a “generalizable scientific understanding of sustainability” [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.