Abstract

BackgroundWithin the framework of close-to-nature forestry, oak forest (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) regeneration techniques that consider both silvicultural and nature conservation demands have become a very important issue. While there are many experimental and local studies that aim at disentangling the relationships between different environmental and silvicultural factors and the success of oak regeneration, systematic supra-regional studies at the greater landscape level are missing so far.Against this background, the first objective (a) of this study was to present an efficient and sufficiently accurate sampling scheme for supra-regional forest regrowth inventories, which we applied to young oaks stands. The second, and major, objective (b) was to identify the crucial success factors for high-quality oak forest regeneration in northwest Germany.ResultsObjective (a): Factors that have been identified as potentially crucial for the success or failure of oak regeneration were either included in a field inventory procedure or extracted from forest inventory databases. We found that the collected data were suitable to be analyzed in a three-step success model, which was aimed at identifying the crucial success factors for high-quality oak forest regeneration.Objective (b): Our modeling procedure, which included a Bayesian estimation approach with spike-and-slab priors, revealed that competitive pressure from the secondary tree species was the most decisive success factor; no competition, or low competition by secondary tree species appeared to be particularly beneficial for the success of high-quality oak regeneration. Also fencing and the absence of competitive vegetation (weeds, grass, bracken) seemed to be beneficial factors for the success of oak regeneration.ConclusionsTrusting in biological automation was found to be mostly useless regarding economically viable oak forest regeneration. To efficiently organize oak regeneration planning and silvicultural decision-making within a forest enterprise, it is strongly recommended to initially evaluate the annual financial and personnel capacities for carrying out young growth tending or pre-commercial thinning and only then to decide on the extent of regenerated oak stands. Careful and adaptive regeneration planning is also indispensable to secure the long-term ecological continuity in oak forests. Oak regeneration should therefore preferably take place within the close vicinity of old oak stands or directly in them. The retention of habitat trees is urgently advised.

Highlights

  • Within the framework of close-to-nature forestry, oak forest (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) regeneration techniques that consider both silvicultural and nature conservation demands have become a very important issue

  • Determining the success of oak regeneration To determine the success of oak regeneration in each study site, we developed a theoretical model with the target values “successful” or “unsuccessful”

  • Following our theoretical model approach to determine the success of oak regeneration, 56 out of 295 study sites (≙ 19%) could be referred to as successfully regenerated young oak stands

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Within the framework of close-to-nature forestry, oak forest (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) regeneration techniques that consider both silvicultural and nature conservation demands have become a very important issue. Strong competition by the shade-tolerant European beech (Fagus sylvatica) has been identified early as problematic for young oak trees, which are more light-demanding (Kunkel 1830; Brumhard 1843; Gayer 1884; Otto et al 2009; Ligot et al 2013) In this context, the appropriate size and shape of canopy openings has been intensively discussed since the nineteenth century (Gayer 1884, 1886; Lüpke 1998; Diaci et al 2008; Březina and Dobrovolný 2011). Competition by early successional broadleaved tree species like birches (Betula spp.) and willows (Salix spp.) has long been known to be a crucial factor influencing the growth of young oaks (Anonymus 1869; Burckhardt 1870; Ammer and Dingel 1997; Wagner and Röker 2000)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call