Subxiphoid-subcostal thoracoscopic thymectomy for seropositive myasthenia offers equivalent remission rates and potentially faster recovery.

Abstract

OBJECTIVESTo compare the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) receiving subxiphoid-subcostal or unilateral thoracoscopic thymectomy and to identify the factors affecting MG prognosis.METHODSFrom January 2013 to December 2019, a total of 137 consecutive MG patients received subxiphoid-subcostal thoracoscopic thymectomy (STT, n = 65) or conventional unilateral thoracoscopic thymectomy (UTT, n = 72). The primary outcomes of this study were perioperative complications, duration and expenses of hospitalization, VAS score and complete stable remission (CSR).RESULTSThe patients receiving STT had significantly shorter drainage duration and postoperative hospital stay and lower hospitalization expenses (P < 0.01). Pain scores on postoperative Days 1, 3, 7 and 14 were significantly lower in patients undergoing STT (P < 0.01). The average follow-up was 54.3 ± 24.18 months, with a CSR rate of 30.6% and an overall effective rate of 87.3%. Through uni- and multivariable analyses, shorter symptom duration and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) class I were independent predictors for CSR in MG patients receiving thymectomy.CONCLUSIONSThe present study not only showed that STT was a safe and feasible technique for MG, with a potentially faster postoperative recovery, lower hospitalization expenses, less postoperative pain and equivalent remission rate, but also revealed that shorter symptom duration and MGFA class I were favourable prognostic factors for CSR.