Abstract

In highly security-critical network environments, it is a popular design decision to offload cryptographic tasks like encryption or signature generation to a dedicated trusted module or key server with paramount security features, we in this paper refer to with the general term Cryptographic Key Management Device (CKMD). While this network design yields several benefits, we demonstrate that the use of popular counter mode encryption modes like CTR or GCM can show substantial shortcomings in terms of security when used in conjunction with this network design. In particular, we show how the use of authenticated encryption using GCM enables the possibility of establishing a subliminal channel by exploiting the authentication information within messages. We show how decoding of hidden information can proceed in addition to decryption of overt information without raising authentication failures. With an exemplary but typical infrastructure, we show how the subliminal channel might be exploited and discuss approaches to mitigating the threat by preventing the ability to embed hidden information. In contrast to previous work, we conclude that, when using an infrastructure involving a CKMD and GCM is deployed, the use of random, CKMD-generated Initialization Vectors (IVs) is beneficial to avoid the subliminal channel described in this paper. However, the most potent remedy is deploying a different operational mode like GCM-SIV.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.