Abstract
Traditional models of suburban employment patterns emphasize continuity in functional differentiation. This results in perpetuation of a pattern in which employing satellites house the greatest concentrations of poor and minority residents, at the highest population density. More recent studies suggest new patterns that result from the competition among even affluent suburbs for tax base, and from the fiscal considerations in locational behavior of firms. For a national sample of suburbs in the period 1960-1980, we find that previous patterns have persisted among suburbs which developed prior to 1950. However, we find a sharp contrast between the correlates of trade and manufacturing employment, and see evidence of a reversal of some key relationships among newer communities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
