Abstract

Traditional accounts often have underestimated complexities involved in suburbanization process by assuming direct, linear causality to explain the suburban patterns of metropolitan development. Yet, an explicit explanation that encompasses the complexities of the multitude of flux of causal relationships and feedbacks and incorporates demographic and morphological variations of contemporary suburban types is still not available. In this paper, I apply a complexity approach to provide an inclusive justification for suburbanization that fits more flexible into most patterns of the post-WW II American suburbs. Taking into account intersections of many weaker factors, this paper approaches suburbanization as an intra-metropolitan residential mobility pattern. Over the course of the second half of the 20th century, residential mobility preferences coupled with land market preferences, technological advancement, and political support to escalate rates of city-to-suburb residential mobility and spread this pattern of mobility.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.