Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form dimeric or oligomeric complexes in vivo. However, the function of oligomerization in receptor-mediated G protein activation is unclear. Previous studies of the yeast alpha-factor receptor (STE2 gene product) have indicated that oligomerization promotes signaling. Here we have addressed the mechanism by which oligomerization facilitates G protein signaling by examining the ability of ligand binding- and G protein coupling-defective alpha-factor receptors to form complexes in vivo and to correct their signaling defects when co-expressed (trans complementation). Newly and previously identified receptor mutants indicated that ligand binding involves the exofacial end of transmembrane domain (TM) 4, whereas G protein coupling involves ic1, ic3, the C-terminal tail, and the intracellular ends of TM2 and TM3. Mutant receptors bearing substitutions in these domains formed homo-oligomeric or hetero-oligomeric complexes in vivo, as indicated by results of fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments. Co-expression of ligand binding- and G protein coupling-defective mutant receptors did not significantly improve signaling. In contrast, co-expression of ic1 and ic3 mutations in trans but not in cis significantly increased signaling efficiency. Therefore, we suggest that subunits of the alpha-factor receptor: 1) are activated independently rather than cooperatively by agonist, and 2) function in a concerted fashion to promote G protein activation, possibly by contacting different subunits or regions of the G protein heterotrimer.

Highlights

  • As the largest class of receptors in humans, guanine nucleotidebinding regulatory protein (G protein)1-coupled receptors (GPCRs) elicit cellular responses to neurotransmitters, hormones, light, and other stimuli

  • In a second model suggested by studies of GABA(B) receptors (16 –20), agonist binding to the R1 subunit induces movement that relieves its inhibitory action on the R2 subunit, which is freed for G protein activation

  • The results suggest that each ␣-factor receptor subunit is activated independently by agonist and that receptor subunits function in cooperation with one another to activate G protein heterotrimers

Read more

Summary

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Yeast Strains and Plasmids—The Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used in these studies were KBY58 (MATa leu112 ura his3-⌬1 trp ste2::leu sst1-⌬5) and JE114-8A (MATa leu112 ura his3⌬1 trp ste2::LEU2 sst). All mutations were made in the single-copy plasmid pRS314Ste2–3myc [39], which uses native STE2 promoter and terminator sequences to drive expression of full-length or C-terminally truncated (at codon 303) ␣-factor receptors tagged at their C termini with three copies of the c-Myc epitope. To construct plasmids expressing tailless wild type or mutant receptors tagged with CFP or YFP, we either subcloned the HpaI-AatII fragment bearing a mutation of interest into pRS423Ste2⌬tail-YFP and pRS424Ste2⌬tail-CFP, or used site-directed mutagenesis to introduce desired mutations into pRS423Ste2⌬tail-YFP and pRS424Ste2⌬tail-CFP. Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)—Scanning fluorometry of intact viable yeast cells co-expressing tailless forms of CFPand YFP-tagged wild type or mutant ␣-factor receptors was used to detect FRET between oligomerized receptors in vivo, as previously described in detail [29, 31, 37]. Localization of GFP-tagged Receptors—Fluorescence images of cells expressing wild type and various receptor mutants tagged with GFP were captured by using a cooled CCD camera (DAGE, Inc.) mounted on an Olympus BH-2 or IX81 microscope equipped with a PlanApo100UV 100ϫ objective, as described previously [38]

RESULTS
FRET efficiency
Tailless receptors
NAa NA NA NA NA NA NA
NAa NA NA NA NA
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call