Abstract

Yeast mitochondrial NAD(+)-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase is an octamer composed of four each of two nonidentical but related subunits designated IDH1 and IDH2. IDH2 was previously shown to contain the catalytic site, whereas IDH1 contributes regulatory properties including cooperativity with respect to isocitrate and allosteric activation by AMP. In this study, interactions between IDH1 and IDH2 were detected using the yeast two-hybrid system, but interactions between identical subunit polypeptides were not detected with this or other methods. A model for heterodimeric interactions between the subunits is therefore proposed for this enzyme. A corollary of this model, based on the three-dimensional structure of the homologous enzyme from Escherichia coli, is that some interactions between subunits occur at isocitrate binding sites. Based on this model, two residues (Lys-183 and Asp-217) in the regulatory IDH1 subunit were predicted to be important in the catalytic site of IDH2. We found that individually replacing these residues with alanine results in mutant enzymes that exhibit a drastic reduction in catalysis both in vitro and in vivo. Also based on this model, the two analogous residues (Lys-189 and Asp-222) of the catalytic IDH2 subunit were predicted to contribute to the regulatory site of IDH1. A K189A substitution in IDH2 was found to produce a decrease in activation of the enzyme by AMP and a loss of cooperativity with respect to isocitrate. A D222A substitution in IDH2 produces similar regulatory defects and a substantial reduction in V(max) in the absence of AMP. Collectively, these results suggest that the basic structural/functional unit of yeast isocitrate dehydrogenase is a heterodimer of IDH1 and IDH2 subunits and that each subunit contributes to the isocitrate binding site of the other.

Highlights

  • NADϩ-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase is thought to be important for regulatory control of mitochondrial energy metabolism primarily because of kinetic responses to adenine nucleotides in in vitro assays

  • Different functions were assigned to the subunits, with IDH2 being primarily responsible for catalysis and with IDH1 playing the primary role in regulation

  • Based on previous results showing that both IDH1 and IDH2 subunits copurify when only one is affinity-tagged (14) and that each residual subunit appears to be monomeric in the absence of the other subunit (6, 7), we have investigated the possibility that the basic structural/functional unit of the enzyme is a heterodimer of an IDH1 and an IDH2 subunit

Read more

Summary

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Yeast Strains and Growth Conditions—In expression studies, the yeast haploid strain S173-6B (MATa, leu[2,3, 112], his[], ura [3–57], trp [1–289]; Ref. 16) was the parental wild-type control. Affinity Purification Tests for Identical Subunit Interactions—A 2.3kilobase pair XbaI/HindIII fragment containing the IDH2 gene with codons for a C-terminal histidine tag was subcloned from pIDH1/ IDH2His (14) into pRS316. The resulting construct (pRS316 IDH1His) was transformed into the ⌬IDH2 strain This transformant contained two types of IDH1, one histidine-tagged and one native. Construction and Purification of Mutant Enzymes—Mutagenesis was performed using the Transformer Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit from CLONTECH Laboratories and the following primers to introduce planned substitutions: IDH1 K183A (5Ј-CAGCTGTGCATGCCGCAAATATCATG), IDH1 D217A (5Ј-CGTCCATCATTGTCGCCAATGCCTCCATGC), IDH2 K189A (5Ј-ATTGTGGTACATGCCTCTACTATCCAG), and IDH2 D222A (5Ј-GAAACTGAA CTTATTGCCAACAGTGTGTTAAAGG) Another primer was used to simultaneously eliminate a unique BamHI site in the vector for selection of the mutant plasmids. Hill plots include data points between 10 and 90% of Vmax

RESULTS
Construct pair
DISCUSSION
Regulatory substitutions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call