Abstract

Background: Data on subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) as an alternative to conventional cholecystectomy in difficult surgical situations are limited. This multi-aspectual report aims to reduce the STC-specific knowledge gap and inform clinical decision-making strategies. Methods: All 180 patients who underwent STC at a single centre between 2011 and 2017 were assessed in this retrospective cohort study. Their outcomes were followed up until March 23, 2018. Six subgroups stratified by surgical setting (elective/non-elective), surgical approach used (open/laparoscopic), and type of procedure (reconstituting/fenestrating) were compared. Findings: The ratio of conventional to STC procedures during the study period was 13:1. Of the 180 patients, 150 (83%) had a history of hospitalisation for acute biliary disease. The proportion of all cholecystectomies that were STC ranged from 1% to 71% between individual surgeons; similarly, laparoscopic STC comprised 0%–97% of all STCs. STC was associated with high intraoperative and short-term postoperative complication rates (10·6% and 88·0%, respectively). There were three intraoperative complications, comprising one case each of bile duct injury (3·9%), significant bleeding from hepatic vessels (3·3%), and intestinal injury requiring repair (2·2%). The most common postoperative surgical site complications were external bile leak (21%), wound infection (17%), and biloma (10%). Strong associations between fenestrating STC and the rates of postoperative bile leak and retained gallstones, mainly in the main bile duct, were observed. A total of 532 targeted non-invasive and invasive investigations (304 computed tomography scans, 153 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography scans, 50 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography scans, and 25 endoscopic ultrasound scans) were performed. Interpretation: STC is associated with significant intraoperative and postoperative complication rates and a high investigation burden. Injury can be avoided when conversion to STC is timely and its technical variant is correctly selected. The STC rate could be introduced as a quality indicator for gallbladder surgery. Funding: Neither author received specific funding for this work. Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Ethics Approval Statement: The institutional clinical audit management board reviewed, approved, and registered the project as a no-risk observational cohort study. Hence, acquisition of informed consent from patients was not required for this study, as it does not include personal information about individual patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.