Abstract

Psychological aggressions are difficult to detect. For instance, different forms of micro male behaviours normally are so subtle that they go unnoticed. According to Intimate Partner Violence perspective, partner violence is bidirectional. Moreover, some authors have reported that partner violence is associated with low levels of satisfaction with the relationship. The objective of this study is cognisance of the incidence of subtle psychological abuse among couples of university students through micro male behaviours and to analyse how it is perceived, taking the sex and the role played into account (perpetrator, victim or both) and the differences depending on the strategies of psychological violence used. University students (N = 1156) from 28 universities from all over Spain, throughout an academic course, participated in this cross-sectional non-experimental study. In order to identify subtle psychological violence, the Questionnaire on Micro Male Conducts of Ferrer et al. (2008) was adapted to a self-report on behaviours used towards the partner (perpetration) and received from him/her (victimisation). Behaviours are grouped into five strategies. We have verified that the couples of young university students report high levels of involvement in micro male behaviours and confirm that aggressions are bidirectional. As far as satisfaction with the partner is concerned, the strategies of psychological violence of confinement to a traditional role and generating insecurity go unnoticed among men. An important difference is found, as women definitely are sensitive towards victimisation of insecurity by their partners. There is a common pattern in terms of strategies of invading spaces and underestimating; in both cases, they have an important impact on satisfaction with the partner and reduce the level thereof. These findings suggest that victims do not properly value the information received. In order to reduce psychological violence among couples, it is important that young people identify abusive behaviours and the level of violence they may be facing.

Highlights

  • It has repeatedly been proved that psychological violence can be just as harmful as physical abuse (Echeburúa & Corral, 1998; O’Leary, 1999; Soler, Barreto, & González, 2005)

  • The objective of this study is to take cognisance of the incidence of subtle psychological abuse among couples of university students through micro male behaviours and to analyse how it is perceived among young men and women, taking the role played into account and the differences depending on the strategies of psychological violence used

  • 80% of women and 70% of man are involved in behaviours of subtle psychological violence within their couples. 71.8% are aggressors and 68% are victims

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has repeatedly been proved that psychological violence can be just as harmful as physical abuse (Echeburúa & Corral, 1998; O’Leary, 1999; Soler, Barreto, & González, 2005). The proportion of young people who admit to practice violence against their partners is somewhere between 10% and 50% (González & Santana, 2001; Hird, 2000; Jackson et al, 2000; Katz, Carino, & Milton, 2002; Muñoz-Rivas, Andreu, Graña, O’Leary, & González, 2007; Murphy & Hoover, 2001; Swart, Garth, & Ricardo, 2002). There are fewer studies on psychological violence among young people compared to physical or sexual violence, it has a higher incidence than physical violence (American College Health Association, 2007; Corral & Calvete, 2006; Forke et al, 2008; Vázquez et al, 2010). The results obtained from the study conducted by Muñoz-Rivas et al (2007) show that 30% of the students of either sex admitted that they had insulted their partner

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call