Abstract

Optimum subsurface well spacing is key to developing unconventional reservoirs. From a field application perspective, this paper presents our systematic study on subsurface well spacing in the Permian Basin for unconventional reservoirs which consisted of four main components, i.e., numerical modeling, well interference quantification through simulation and regression, field pilot analogs, and economic evaluation. In this paper, field pilot wells are actual wells in the field to test different well spacing and completion designs.To capture upsized and downsized completions, a wide range of fracture designs in combination with different well spacing scenarios are conducted for both hydraulic fracture modeling and reservoir simulation. At the section level (1 mile by 1 mile, 640 acres), multiple wells are simulated to better capture well interactions and reservoir property variations. A complex fracture network is generated by considering interactions between natural fracture and hydraulic fracture. Well interference, which is determined by estimating ultimate recovery (EUR) difference between a single well and a middle well from multiple wells, is analyzed for general trend regressions and validated through field test results. At the section level, economics is done to evaluate capital efficiency of various scenarios. Resultsfrom both modeling work and pilots indicate that larger hydraulic fracture size without an increase in subsurface well spacing does not necessarily improve section EUR and there is a point of diminishing returns. Larger subsurface well spacing with bigger fracture size is thereby a preferable combination.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call