Abstract

Background: Toothpastes containing nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HAp) substituted with metal ions provide calcium and phosphate ions to dental hard tissues, reducing demineralization, and promoting remineralization. Few data are available about the effect of these bioactive compounds on oral microbiota. Methods: This in vitro study evaluated the influence of two commercially-available substituted n-HAp-based toothpastes (α: Zn-carbonate substituted n-HAp; β: F, Mg, Sr-carbonate substituted n-HAp) on early colonization (EC, 12 h) and biofilm formation (BF, 24 h) by oral microbiota. Controls were brushed with distilled water. Artificial oral microcosm and Streptococcus mutans biofilms were developed using human enamel and a resin-based composite (RBC) as adherence surfaces. Two test setups, a shaking multiwell plate and a modified drip-flow reactor (MDFR), were used to simulate clinical conditions during the night (low salivary flow and clearance) and daytime, respectively. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) was used to evaluate specimens’ surfaces after toothpaste treatment. Fluoride release from β toothpaste was evaluated. Viable adherent biomass was quantified by MTT assay, and biofilms’ morphology was highlighted using confocal microscopy. Results: EDS showed the presence of remnants from the tested toothpastes on both adherence surfaces. β toothpaste showed significantly lower EC and BF compared to control using the artificial oral microcosm model, while α toothpaste showed lower EC and BF compared to control, but higher EC and BF compared to β toothpaste. The effect shown by β toothpaste was, to a minimal extent, due to fluoride release. Interestingly, this result was seen on both adherence surfaces, meaning that the tested toothpastes significantly influenced EC and BF even on RBC surfaces. Furthermore, the effect of toothpaste treatments was higher after 12 h than 24 h, suggesting that toothbrushing twice a day is more effective than brushing once. Conclusions: The efficacy of these treatments in reducing microbial colonization of RBC surfaces may represent a promising possibility in the prevention of secondary caries.

Highlights

  • Biofilms colonizing dental surfaces represent the habitat of a wide range of microorganisms

  • Swihginleifiβ ctoaonthtpianstcerceoansteainiend ssturornfatiucem,zminagcnecsoiunmte, nantdaffluteoridtere(Faitgmurent with α toothpaste3,).aEnndamaelssipgenciimficenasnsthionwcerdeaasseiginnifisctarnotnintciuremaseainndsumrfaacge nziensciucomntecnot naftteenr ttraeafttmerenttrewaitthmαent with β toothpastettoo(ooTtthhappbaalssettee2,()aT.naVdbelear2ys)i.giVnnietfreiycraeinnsttteiirnnecsgrtelinaysg,elEyi,DnEsSDtrSdodnetetiteuecmctteeaddntdhthemeparpgensreeenssicueemnocfcecoanolctfeiuncmtalacaftnieudrmptrheaoastnmpdheanpttehwoonisthtphhβe ate on the surfaces ofsuRrfBaCcesspofecRiBmCesnpsectirmeaentesdtrweaitethd bwoitthhbtootohtthopotahsptaesst,esa,saws welelllasastrtraacceess ooff zziinnccoonnspspeceimciemnsens treated with α toottrheapteadstweitahnαdtomotahgpnasetesiaunmd moangnsepsieucmimonenspsetcrimeaentesdtrewatietdhwβithtoβottohotphapsatsete((Fiigguurere2,2T,aTblaeb2l)e. 2)

  • Dcoifnfteariennst Zsunp-cearsrbcroinpat tleetsteurbssitnitduitceadtens-iHgnAifpic;aβnttdoiofftherpeanscteescboentwtaeinesn Fg,roMugp,sS(Tr-uckarebyo’sntaetset,spu

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biofilms colonizing dental surfaces represent the habitat of a wide range of microorganisms In healthy conditions, this microbial community provides fundamental benefits to host surfaces, including homeostasis of critical environmental parameters such as pH, as well as protection against colonization by exogenous species. Nanotechnology applications offer the opportunity to modulate the formation of dental biofilms using nanoparticles with bioactive effects Their possible use in biofilm control is related to some peculiar characteristics that materials acquire when nano-sized: shape, surface-to-volume ratio, chemical reactivity, and ability to interact with the bacterial cell wall directly [6,7,8]. The effect shown by β toothpaste was, to a minimal extent, due to fluoride release This result was seen on both adherence surfaces, meaning that the tested toothpastes significantly influenced EC and BF even on RBC surfaces. Conclusions: The efficacy of these treatments in reducing microbial colonization of RBC surfaces may represent a promising possibility in the prevention of secondary caries

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call