Subseasonal Ensemble Prediction of Flash Droughts over China

Abstract

Abstract Flash droughts have been occurring frequently worldwide, which has a serious impact on food and water security. The rapid onset of flash droughts presents a challenge to the subseasonal forecast, but there is limited knowledge about their forecast skills due to the lack of appropriate identification and assessment procedures. Here, we investigate the forecast skill of flash droughts over China with lead times up to 3 weeks by using hindcast datasets from the Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Prediction (S2S) project. The flash droughts are identified by using weekly soil moisture percentiles from two S2S forecast models (ECMWF and NCEP). The comparison with reanalysis shows that ECMWF and NCEP forecast models underestimate flash drought occurrence by 5% and 19% for lead 1 week. The national mean hit rates for flash droughts are 0.22 and 0.16 for ECMWF and NCEP models for lead 1 week, and they can reach 0.29 and 0.18 over South China. The ensemble of the two models increases equitable threat score (ETS) from ECMWF and NCEP models by 8% and 40% for lead 1 week. In terms of probabilistic forecast, ECMWF has a higher Brier skill score than NCEP, especially over eastern China, which is consistent with higher temperature and precipitation forecast skill. The multimodel ensemble has the highest Brier skill score. This study suggests the importance of multimodel ensemble flash drought forecasting. Significance Statement Flash droughts have raised considerable concern, but whether they can be predicted at subseasonal time scales remains unclear. This study evaluates forecast skill of flash droughts over China based on ECMWF and NCEP hindcast data. Focusing on the historical flash drought events identified by the onset speed and duration, it is found that the ECMWF model outperformed the NCEP model with higher hit rates, lower false alarm ratios, and higher equitable threat scores, especially during the first week. However, less than 30% of the drought events can be captured in most regions by both models. An ensemble of the two models showed skill improvement against the ECMWF model for both deterministic and probabilistic forecasts.