Abstract

Selection of oviposition sites by gravid females is a critical behavioral step in the reproductive cycle of Anopheles coluzzii, which is one of the principal Afrotropical malaria vector mosquitoes. Several studies suggest this decision is mediated by semiochemicals associated with potential oviposition sites. To better understand the chemosensory basis of this behavior and identify compounds that can modulate oviposition, we examined the generally held hypothesis that suboptimal larval habitats give rise to semiochemicals that negatively influence the oviposition preference of gravid females. Dual-choice bioassays indicated that oviposition sites conditioned in this manner do indeed foster significant and concentration dependent aversive effects on the oviposition site selection of gravid females. Headspace analyses derived from aversive habitats consistently noted the presence of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl trisulfide (DMTS) and 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (sulcatone) each of which unitarily affected An. coluzzii oviposition preference. Electrophysiological assays across the antennae, maxillary palp, and labellum of gravid An. coluzzii revealed differential responses to these semiochemicals. Taken together, these findings validate the hypothesis in question and suggest that suboptimal environments for An. coluzzii larval development results in the release of DMDS, DMTS and sulcatone that impact the response valence of gravid females.

Highlights

  • Mosquito-borne malaria remains among the greatest threats to global human health [1]

  • Aversive responses that reduced oviposition increased relative to the number of larvae in larval water (LW) treatments with oviposition index (OI) values ranging from -0.25 to -0.79 (50 to 300 larvae, Fig 1B)

  • The number of total eggs collected from two oviposition cups in the dual choice bioassay was not affected by the initial number of larvae used for LW conditioning (ANOVA, F5,164 = 1.61, p = 0.16; S2A Fig) suggesting the presence of compounds in the assay cages neither stimulated nor deterred oviposition of gravid females

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mosquito-borne malaria remains among the greatest threats to global human health [1]. Inasmuch as effective vaccines are still elusive, the widespread use of the current set of anti-malarials and insecticides has contributed to the rise in resistance to these agents in both pathogens and vectors, respectively [2, 3]. In this light, vector control remains among the most effective methods in reducing disease transmission [4]. A critical feature of improved vector control programs is an enhanced understanding of the mechanistic basis of both vector competence and vectorial capacity. PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149800 February 22, 2016

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call