Abstract

Achieving US state and municipal benchmarks to end the HIV epidemic and promote health equity requires access to comprehensive HIV care. However, this care may not be geographically accessible for all people living with HIV (PLHIV). We estimated county‐level drive time and suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care across the contiguous US, assessing regional and urban–rural differences. We integrated publicly available data from four federal databases to identify and geocode sites providing comprehensive HIV care in 2015, defined as the co‐located provision of core HIV medical care and support services. Leveraging street network, US Census and HIV surveillance data (2014), we used geographic analysis to estimate the fastest one‐way drive time between the population‐weighted county centroid and the nearest site providing HIV care for counties reporting at least five diagnosed HIV cases. We summarized HIV care sites, county‐level drive time, population‐weighted drive time and suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care, by US region and county rurality (2013). Geographic accessibility to HIV care was suboptimal if drive time was >30 min, a common threshold for primary care accessibility in the general US population. Tests of statistical significance were not performed, since the analysis is population‐based. We identified 671 HIV care sites across the US, with 95% in urban counties. Nationwide, the median county‐level drive time to HIV care is 69 min (interquartile range (IQR) 66 min). The median county‐level drive time to HIV care for rural counties (90 min, IQR 61) is over twice that of urban counties (40 min, IQR 48), with the greatest urban–rural differences in the West. Nationally, population‐weighted drive time, an approximation of individual‐level drive time, is over five times longer in rural counties than in urban counties. Geographic access to HIV care is suboptimal for over 170,000 people diagnosed with HIV (19%), with over half of these individuals from the South and disproportionately the rural South. Nationally, approximately 80,000 (9%) drive over an hour to receive HIV care. Suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care is an important structural barrier in the US, particularly for rural residents living with HIV in the South and West. Targeted policies and interventions to address this challenge should become a priority.

Highlights

  • Many United States (US) municipalities and states are implementing strategic plans to end HIV as an epidemic [1]

  • These outcomes may be limited by inadequate geographic access to HIV care: mounting evidence suggests that people living with HIV (PLHIV) who travel longer to receive care are less likely to be linked to care and achieve viral suppression [4,5]

  • Urban–rural differences decrease, with 39% of individuals with suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care living in rural counties, most of whom live in the South (62%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many United States (US) municipalities and states are implementing strategic plans to end HIV as an epidemic [1]. In addition to meeting benchmarks such as percent virally suppressed and number of new cases, these plans typically promote improved health equity for people living with or at risk for HIV. Achieving these goals requires access to and use of comprehensive, coordinated HIV care (HIV care) for all populations. Receipt of HIV care is associated with higher retention in care and improved viral suppression [2], which are critical for improved quality and length of life and for preventing HIV transmission [3]. This urban–rural disparity is an area of particular relevance given a growing rural and suburban population of PLHIV [7-9] but historical allocation of federal HIV prevention funds and Ryan White HIV/AIDS programme resources to urban centres [10,11]

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.