Abstract

The Open Method of Coordination (OMC) is currently under intense academic scrutiny, with attempts to assess its nature as a mode of governance (De la Porte et al 2001; Dehousse 2002; Scott and Trubek 2002) and the extent to which it can be seen as a ‘new’ mode of governance (Laffan and Shaw 2005, Smismans 2006). The OMC does exhibit some clearly different characteristics from what is termed the classic ‘Community Method’; however, with the recent re-launch of the Lisbon Strategy emphasising the need for streamlining and greater coordination of EU policies, the distinctions between ‘old’ and ‘new’ governance are becoming ever more blurred.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.