Abstract

In recent years, analytical tools of network theory have provided strong empirical support to the well-known hypothesis that regions develop through the local learning of capabilities (tacit productive knowledge). In this paper, we compare two indexes of competitiveness (or accumulated capabilities) for a subnational database of 32 Mexican states in the period 2004–2014. We find that Endogenous Fitness (i.e., region fitness and product complexity are derived jointly using only a Mexican exports database) has a better performance than Exogenous Fitness (i.e., product complexity comes from a world exports database and fitness is the sum of the complexity scores for the region’s competitive products). The performance criterion is established with the indicator’s capacity to meet a requirement of growth predictability: the existence of at least one laminar (ordered) regime in the fitness–income plane. In the Mexican data, Endogenous Fitness is a reliable predictor of per capita GDP in two distinct areas of the plane: one of continuous progress and opportunities, and another of stagnation and deteriorating fitness. The predictive capacity of this indicator becomes clear only when the metrics’ calculations are filtered by removing raw petroleum or oil-dependent states, while such capacity is robust to the inclusion of tourism—another important industry of the Mexican economy.

Highlights

  • Contrary to the propositions of conventional trade theory, the empirical evidence suggests that most countries are competitive in a variety of products

  • Development trap for unproductive and low fitness states and a virtuous cycle for relatively rich and in Appendix A.5, we modify the specification of revealed comparative advantage (RCA) by dividing the export value of a highFinally, fitness states

  • In Appendix A5, we modify the specification of RCA by dividing the export value of a product a state andof in economic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Contrary to the propositions of conventional trade theory, the empirical evidence suggests that most countries are competitive in a variety of products. Any country’s productive structure (or export profile) can be characterized as the subset of nodes whose revealed comparative advantage (RCA) is relatively large (i.e., the country is competitive in producing such goods) This methodology was initially elaborated for analyzing the fitness (competitiveness or economic complexity) of countries, it is possible to carry out subnational studies to determine the competitiveness of the regional economies of a particular country. For any pair of coordinates in the area associated to the ordered regime, there is a high degree of predictability with respect to the direction that these variables will follow in the proximate future (around 10 years) With these tools, we find empirical support to the hypothesis that Endogenous Fitness is more suitable for predicting purposes since the longitudinal data for the period 2004–2014 generates laminar regimes across the plane. The paper ends with a summary of the results and some additional considerations

Productive Capabilities and Regional Development
Two Forms of Measuring Economic Fitness
32 Mexican states
Fitness–income
The Dynamic of Income and Endogenous Fitness without Raw Petroleum
The Dynamic of Economic
Ranking
Conclusions
Exogenous
Endogenous
Regional
F Statistic
Findings
A Historical
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call