Abstract

In modular multilevel converters (MMCs), temperature control of semiconductor devices in the submodules (SMs) is a key factor for the safe and reliable operation. Under normal operation, significant temperature differences can exist between SMs due to, for example, aging of semiconductor modules and module parameter mismatch. This paper presents a method for achieving SM thermal balancing by controlling the capacitor voltage of each SM in an arm, while maintaining the sum of the SM capacitor voltages at a constant value in order to regulate the dc-link voltage. The proposed temperature balancing strategy is validated using an experimental MMC setup with three SMs, where an increase in the thermal resistance to ambient of one or more SM semiconductors is created by restricting coolant flow to simulate a partial failure in the cooling system. Increases in the thermal resistance by 21% and 42%, corresponding to temperature increases of 5 and 10 $^{\circ}$ C, respectively, are managed by three SMs, using a capacitor voltage margin of 60%.

Highlights

  • ODULAR multilevel converters (MMCs) are a widely used voltage source converter (VSC) topology for medium voltage drives [1] and high-voltage direct current (HVdc) transmission systems [2]

  • The proposed method is validated in MATLAB/Simulink using the piece-wise linear electric circuit simulation (PLECS) Toolbox [18], with the parameters of the modular multilevel converters (MMCs)

  • This paper presented a method of SMs’ semiconductor temperature balancing in MMC-based applications

Read more

Summary

Introduction

ODULAR multilevel converters (MMCs) are a widely used voltage source converter (VSC) topology for medium voltage drives [1] and high-voltage direct current (HVdc) transmission systems [2]. For industrial applications [3], dozens or even hundreds of submodules (SMs), each supporting a few kilovolts, are employed to produce a quasi-sinusoidal voltage waveform from a dc-link. This SM-based structure distributes the stored energy across the SM capacitors instead of M.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.