Abstract

AbstractThe control of slide blocks on slope depositional systems is investigated in a high‐quality 3D seismic volume from the Espírito Santo Basin, SE Brazil. Seismic interpretation and statistical methods were used to understand the effect of differential compaction on strata proximal to the headwall of a blocky mass‐transport deposit (MTD), where blocks are large and undisturbed (remnant), and in the distal part of this same deposit. The distal part contains smaller rafted blocks that moved and deformed with the MTD. Upon their emplacement, the positive topographic relief of blocks created a rugged seafloor, confining sediment pathways and creating accommodation space for slope sediment. In parallel, competent blocks resisted compaction more than the surrounding debrite matrix during early burial. This resulted in differential compaction between competent blocks and soft flanking strata, in a process that was able to maintain a rugged seafloor for >5 Ma after burial. Around the largest blocks, a cluster of striations associated with a submarine channel bypassed these obstructions on the slope and, as a result, reflects important deflection by blocks and compaction‐related folds that were obstructing turbidite flows. Log‐log graphs were made to compare the width and height of different stratigraphic elements; blocks, depocentres and channels. There is a strong correlation between the sizes of each element, but with each subsequent stage (block–depocentre–channel) displaying marked reductions in height. Blocky MTDs found on passive margins across the globe are likely to experience similar effects during early burial to those documented in this work.

Highlights

  • Mass-wasting is capable of transporting large volumes of sediment downslope and is one of the primary processes filling deep-water sedimentary basins around the world (Beaubouef & Abreu, 2010; Gamboa, Alves, Cartwright, & Terrinha, 2010; Gee, Gawthorpe, & Friedmann, 2006; Masson, Harbitz, Wynn, Pedersen, & Løvholt, 2006; Newton, Shipp, Mosher, & Wach, 2004; Omosanya & Alves, 2013)

  • Mass-wasting on continental slopes usually occurs in the form of recurrent or discrete events, as documented in Pickering and Hiscott (2015). Both types of events can remobilize competent blocks ranging from boulders to large slide blocks of strata >1 km in diameter, sometimes within a muddy, compactible debris-flow matrix (Alves & Cartwright, 2010; Armitage, Romans, Covault, & Graham, 2009; Hampton, Lee, & Locat, 1996; Masson et al, 2006; Pickering & Corregidor, 2005; Posamentier & Kolla, 2003)

  • This paper investigated the effects of differential compaction over remnant and rafted blocks within an mass-transport deposit (MTD)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Mass-wasting is capable of transporting large volumes of sediment downslope and is one of the primary processes filling deep-water sedimentary basins around the world (Beaubouef & Abreu, 2010; Gamboa, Alves, Cartwright, & Terrinha, 2010; Gee, Gawthorpe, & Friedmann, 2006; Masson, Harbitz, Wynn, Pedersen, & Løvholt, 2006; Newton, Shipp, Mosher, & Wach, 2004; Omosanya & Alves, 2013). Mass-wasting on continental slopes usually occurs in the form of recurrent (mass-transport complex) or discrete (masstransport deposit) events, as documented in Pickering and Hiscott (2015) Both types of events can remobilize competent blocks ranging from boulders to large slide blocks of strata >1 km in diameter, sometimes within a muddy, compactible debris-flow matrix (Alves & Cartwright, 2010; Armitage, Romans, Covault, & Graham, 2009; Hampton, Lee, & Locat, 1996; Masson et al, 2006; Pickering & Corregidor, 2005; Posamentier & Kolla, 2003). Variations in compaction rate (differential compaction) can produce local topographic highs above the less compactible strata and increase accommodation space over the more compactible units (Hunt & Swarbrick, 1996; Maillard, Gaullier, Vendeville, & Odonne, 2003; Rusciadelli & Di Simone, 2007) Such a phenomenon has a profound effect on the subsequent architecture of slope.

How did MTD A control the seafloor sediment distribution post-burial?
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call