Abstract
PurposeHemoglobin (Hb) transfusion thresholds are established in intensive care units. A restrictive transfusion threshold (Hb 70–75 g/l) is recommended in septic patients, and a liberal transfusion threshold (Hb 90 g/l) for cardiogenic shock. It is unclear whether these historically adopted transfusion thresholds meet the challenges of individual patients.MethodsWe evaluated microvascular flow index (MFI) and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) in the sublingual microcirculation with CytoCam-IDF microscopy and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). A study team-independent, treating intensivist assigned a total of 64 patients to 1 of 2 two transfusion thresholds, 43 patients to the Hb 75 g/l threshold and 21 patients to the Hb 90 g/l threshold, at a surgical intensive care unit. We performed microcirculatory measurements 1 h before and 1 h after transfusion of 1 unit of red blood cells.ResultsMicrocirculatory flow variables correlated negatively with pre-transfusion flow variables (ΔMFI: ρ = − 0.821, p < 0.001; ΔPPV: ρ = − 0.778, p < 0.001). Patients with good initial microcirculation (cutoffs: MFI > 2.84, PPV > 88%) showed a deteriorated microcirculation after red blood cell transfusion. An impaired microcirculation improved after transfusion. At both transfusion thresholds, approximately one third of the patients showed an initially impaired microcirculation. In contrast, one third in every group had good microcirculation above the cutoff variables and did not profit from the transfusion.ConclusionThe data suggest that the established transfusion thresholds and other hemodynamic variables do not reflect microcirculatory perfusion of patients. Blood transfusion at both thresholds 75 g/l and 90 g/l hemoglobin can either improve or harm the microcirculatory blood flow, questioning the concept of arbitrary transfusion thresholds.
Highlights
Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is associated with various risks and complications
We evaluated the influence of RBC transfusion on the microcirculation at the two widely accepted transfusion thresholds (TTHs; 75 g/l and 90 g/l) and tested the hypothesis that RBC transfusion improves microcirculation independent of the accepted transfusion thresholds
We found no correlation with pre-transfusion Hb and ΔMFI (ρ = − 0.242), ΔPPV (ρ = − 0.187), ΔTVD (ρ = − 0.161), and ΔPVD (ρ = − 0.124)
Summary
Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is associated with various risks and complications. A meta-analysis [4] from 2016 found that a restrictive transfusion threshold might affect the outcome of cardiovascular and elderly orthopedic patients. Despite these uncertainties, most upto-date guidelines recommend a restrictive transfusion protocol for all patients except for those with active bleeding or untreated cardiovascular diseases [5,6,7]. Most upto-date guidelines recommend a restrictive transfusion protocol for all patients except for those with active bleeding or untreated cardiovascular diseases [5,6,7] Overall, these studies used negative outcome but not possible benefits for the patients to delimit the current transfusion thresholds. Whether transfusion thresholds can be seen as arbitrary and should, be individualized is a matter of discussion [8, 9]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
