Abstract

High and low risktakers listened to contrived tape-recorded discussions in which group norms supported either high-, medium-, or low-risk positions. Changes in own risk preferences and in the perception of others’ risk preferences varied with information exposure and initial risk proneness. Ss who heard views similar to their own did not shift in their judgments, whereas those who heard riskier positions than their own shifted toward risk, and those who heard more cautious positions than their own shifted toward caution. The implications of these results for the risk-as-value and the reference group hypotheses are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.