Abstract

Citizens entrust the government with taking care of their well-being and most governments are committed to improving citizen well-being. Nevertheless, there is a divergence between government and citizen perceived notions of well-being. This divergence largely arises because bureaucratic policy making is rooted in measuring public policy outcomes of citizen well-being in objective indicators that underemphasise the importance of subjective well-being. Using the case of three Greater China societies of China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, this article highlights the importance of socio-psychological factors and subjective perceptions of income inequality in affecting subjective well-being in Greater China. Thus, public policy makers should broaden the framing of well-being in the form of objective and subjective well-being and apply the appropriate policy measures.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.