Abstract

Game theory models predict the outcome of a dyadic contest to depend on opponents’ asymmetries in three main traits: resource-holding potential (RHP), resource value (RV) and aggressiveness. Using male common wall lizards Podarcis muralis, a polymorphic species showing three discrete morphs (white, yellow, and red), we investigated how the aggressive behavior varies according to a change in subjective RV and color morphs, while controlling for the asymmetry in RHP (using mirrors). By comparing the aggression of the same individual towards its mirror image in two different arenas (familiar = high subjective RV; novel = low subjective RV), we showed that lizard aggressive behavior was more intense and prolonged in the familiar arena than in the new one, thus supporting the occurrence of a direct relationship between motivation and aggression in this species. We also found the overall aggressiveness to differ from individual to individual, supporting the general hypothesis that aggressiveness is a trait associated with personality. By contrast, no effect of morphs was detected, ruling out the occurrence of morph specific variation in the aggressiveness. Our results highlight that an individual’s motivation and personality might be as important as RHP and RV in the resolution of animal contests.

Highlights

  • Agonistic encounters in animals occur when two individuals compete for a limited resource, such as food, territories or mates (Huntingford and Turner 1987; Archer 1988; Hack 1997)

  • The main aim of our study was to test if lizards escalate in a combat when their subjective resource value (RV) is higher, after controlling for asymmetries in resource-holding potential (RHP) and objective RV between the two opponents

  • By measuring the aggressive behavior in two opposite contexts, we clearly showed that lizards displayed a more intense aggression, and for a much longer time, when fighting for the territory of which they had a prior knowledge rather than for the territory not previously explored

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agonistic encounters in animals occur when two individuals compete for a limited resource, such as food, territories or mates (Huntingford and Turner 1987; Archer 1988; Hack 1997). Contests carry costs for opponents, which may include an increased risk of injuries and mortality (Dufty 1989; Marler and Moore 1988), or predation risk

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call