Abstract

Empirical research on the sequential decomposition of an auditory scene primarily relies on interleaved sound mixtures of only two tone sequences (e.g., ABAB…). This oversimplifies the sound decomposition problem by limiting the number of putative perceptual organizations. The current study used a sound mixture composed of three different tones (ABCABC…) that could be perceptually organized in many different ways. Participants listened to these sequences and reported their subjective perception by continuously choosing one out of 12 visually presented perceptual organization alternatives. Different levels of frequency and spatial separation were implemented to check whether participants' perceptual reports would be systematic and plausible. As hypothesized, while perception switched back and forth in each condition between various perceptual alternatives (multistability), spatial as well as frequency separation generally raised the proportion of segregated and reduced the proportion of integrated alternatives. During segregated percepts, in contrast to the hypothesis, many participants had a tendency to perceive two streams in the foreground, rather than reporting alternatives with a clear foreground-background differentiation. Finally, participants perceived the organization with intermediate feature values (e.g., middle tones of the pattern) segregated in the foreground slightly less often than similar alternatives with outer feature values (e.g., higher tones).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.