Abstract

Learning is often accompanied by a subjective sense of confidence in one’s knowledge, a feeling of knowing what you know and how well you know it. Subjective confidence has been shown to guide learning in other domains, but has received little attention so far in the word learning literature. Across three word learning experiments, we investigated whether and how a sense of confidence in having acquired a word meaning influences the word learning process itself. First, we show evidence for a confirmation bias during word learning in a cross-situational statistical learning task: Learners who are highly confident they know the meaning of a word are more likely to persist in their belief than learners who are not, even after observing objective evidence disconfirming their belief. Second, we show that subjective confidence in a word meaning modulates inferential processes based on that word, affecting learning over the whole lexicon: Learners who hold high confidence in a word meaning are more likely to use that word to make mutual exclusivity inferences about the meaning of other words. We conclude that confidence influences word learning by modulating both information selection processes and inferential processes and discuss the implications of these results for word learning models.

Highlights

  • An important question concerns how hypotheses about a word meaning are formed and evaluated across learning exposures

  • When participants were more confident in an incorrect word-object mapping, they were more likely to ignore an informative trial that disconfirmed the mapping. These findings are consistent with the existence of a confirmation bias during word learning: participants who had the chance to confirm an incorrect word-object mapping multiple times were more likely to experience a boost in confidence for that mapping and more likely to persist in their belief in that mapping even after receiving objective evidence that they were incorrect

  • Experiment 1 showed that subjective confidence influences information processing during the learning of individual words

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An important question concerns how hypotheses about a word meaning are formed and evaluated across learning exposures. Other evidence supports an hypothesis-testing mechanism in which learning is more discrete, with learners selecting the most likely meaning for a word in a given moment and subsequently confirming or falsifying this hypothesis as new information becomes available in subsequent word usages (Medina, Snedeker, Trueswell, & Gleitman, 2011; Trueswell, Medina, Hafri, & Gleitman, 2013; Yang, 2020). While the use of one or the other mechanism may depend on attentional and memory demands (Yurovsky & Frank, 2015), both mechanisms focus on how learners use their objective experience with the world, in and across learning exposures, to generate and evaluate word meaning hypotheses and do not attempt to capture the influence of more subjective processe

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call