Subjective cognition in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy recipients.

Abstract

7020 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy can lead to durable responses in chemorefractory patients with hematologic malignancies. CAR-T, however, can be associated with neurotoxicity. There is a significant body of literature describing patient-reported concerns with cognition in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, a similar treatment group. However, little is known about subjective cognition in CAR-T patients. This study examined changes in subjective cognition over time in CAR-T recipients and compared their outcomes with allogeneic HCT recipients. Methods: At baseline and 90 days after infusion, participants completed the Everyday Cognition Questionnaire (ECog). The ECog provides scores for total cognition, memory, language, visuospatial abilities, planning, organization, divided attention, and satisfaction with cognition. Comparison data from allogeneic HCT recipients came from a previous observational study. Linear mixed models compared changes in subjective cognition between recipients of CAR-T and allogeneic HCT over time. Models were adjusted by age, marital status, education, and Karnofsky performance status. Results: Participants were 111 CAR-T recipients (mean age 60 years, 37% female) and 190 allogeneic HCT recipients (mean age 53, 42% female). Linear mixed models indicated CAR-T recipients’ subjective cognition didn’t change within the 90 days after infusion (p’s > .05). At baseline, there were no group differences between CAR-T and allogeneic HCT recipients in subjective cognition (p’s > 0.05). Over time, however, subjective cognition between groups differed. Specifically, CAR-T recipients reported stable subjective cognition whereas allogeneic HCT recipients reported worsening total subjective cognition (p = 0.04), memory (p = 0.02), visuospatial abilities (p = 0.01), planning (p = 0.01), and divided attention (p = 0.01). At follow-up, CAR-T recipients reported better total subjective cognition (p < 0.01), memory (p < 0.01), language (p = 0.01), visuospatial abilities (p < 0.01), planning (p < 0.01), and divided attention (p < 0.01) than allogeneic HCT recipients. Conclusions: Despite the neurotoxicity associated with CAR-T, patients can expect to perceive similar subjective cognition at day 90 compared to baseline. Future studies should also evaluate objective cognition in CAR-T recipients.