Abstract
I find that corporate boards frequently link CEO compensation to subjective performance measures that are neither accounting ratios nor stock returns. Subjective measurement incorporates soft information privately observed by the board about the CEO’s contribution to long-term firm value. I show that when shareholders’ investment horizon is longer, there is a larger fraction of CEO compensation based on subjectivity, consistent with optimal contracting. Moreover, subjective compensation is more relevant for maintaining long-term incentives when the other compensation components are temporarily dysfunctional, such as during periods when there is large vesting of equity awards. In particular, while large vesting of equity awards creates the distortionary incentive for CEOs to reduce investment growth, such adverse effect is significantly attenuated by subjective compensation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
