Abstract

Organisms are constantly extracting information from the temporal structure of the environment, which allows them to select appropriate actions and predict impending changes. Several lines of research have suggested that interval timing is modulated by the dopaminergic system. It has been proposed that higher levels of dopamine cause an internal clock to speed up, whereas less dopamine causes a deceleration of the clock. In most experiments the subjects are first trained to perform a timing task while drug free. Consequently, most of what is known about the influence of dopaminergic modulation of timing is on well-established timing performance. In the current study the impact of altered DA on the acquisition of temporal control was the focal question. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were distributed randomly into three different groups (haloperidol, d-amphetamine or vehicle). Each animal received an injection 15 min prior to the start of every session from the beginning of interval training. The subjects were trained in a Fixed Interval (FI) 16s schedule followed by training on a peak procedure in which 64s non-reinforced peak trials were intermixed with FI trials. In a final test session all subjects were given vehicle injections and 10 consecutive non-reinforced peak trials to see if training under drug conditions altered the encoding of time. The current study suggests that administration of drugs that modulate dopamine do not alter the encoding temporal durations but do acutely affect the initiation of responding.

Highlights

  • Organisms are constantly extracting information from the temporal structure of the environment, which allows them to select appropriate actions and predict impending changes

  • Post hoc tests showed that the vehicle and haloperidol group differed in every block, while the d-amphetamine and haloperidol groups differed in peak rate during blocks 2 and 4

  • Follow-up ANOVAs in each block showed a significant difference between groups in the first block arising from significantly higher rates in the d-amphetamine group compared to the haloperidol group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organisms are constantly extracting information from the temporal structure of the environment, which allows them to select appropriate actions and predict impending changes. The current study suggests that administration of drugs that modulate dopamine do not alter the encoding temporal durations but do acutely affect the initiation of responding. Several lines of research have suggested that interval timing is strongly modulated by the dopaminergic system (Agostino, Golombek, & Meck, 2011; Balci, 2014; Meck, 1996) One explanation of this modulation is that dopamine modulates clock speed. It has been suggested that since dopamine affects motivation that the modulation of timed behavior might involve changes in the thresholds to start behavior rather than timing, per se (Balci, Ludvig, Abner, Zhuang, Poon, & Brunner, 2010; Balci, Ludvig, & Brunner, 2010; Balci, 2014; Taylor, Horvitz, & Balsam, 2007). If subjects were tested without drugs (with normalized clock speed), those subjects who were trained with a fast clock would respond later in real time (it would take longer to reach a time encoded by a fast clock) while those trained with the antagonist would be expected to respond earlier (it would take less time to reach a time encoded by a slow clock)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.