Subignited, ITER-Like Designs—A Question of Confinement Margin

Abstract

If the next-step International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is designed to operate at finite energy multiplication (Q [approximately] 10 to 20), as opposed to ignition (Q [approximately] [infinity]), appreciable reductions in size and cost will result. Ignition will be attainable in such a [open quotes]high-Q targeted[close quotes] device under slightly enhanced confinement conditions. For example, with the nominal design guidelines, from the ITER Conceptual Design Activity (CDA), designing for Q = 15 instead of ignition results in [approximately] 20% savings in size and cost. Ignition would still be achievable in such a reduced-size device if the L-mode energy confinement enhancement factor (i.e., H factor) is [approximately] 15% higher than the assumed nominal value of 2.0. This size/cost impact is large compared to other sensitivities, and the range of H-factor improvement needed to recoup ignition is small compared to the uncertainty in the confinement scalings themselves. 12 refs., 2 figs., 1 tab.