Abstract

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is divided into three major histopathologic groups—clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC) and chromophobe RCC (chRCC). We performed a comprehensive re-analysis of publicly available RCC datasets from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) database, thereby combining samples from all three subgroups, for an exploratory transcriptome profiling of RCC subgroups.Materials and Methods: We used FPKM (fragments per kilobase per million) files derived from the ccRCC, pRCC and chRCC cohorts of the TCGA database, representing transcriptomic data of 891 patients. Using principal component analysis, we visualized datasets as t-SNE plot for cluster detection. Clusters were characterized by machine learning, resulting gene signatures were validated by correlation analyses in the TCGA dataset and three external datasets (ICGC RECA-EU, CPTAC-3-Kidney, and GSE157256).Results: Many RCC samples co-clustered according to histopathology. However, a substantial number of samples clustered independently from histopathologic origin (mixed subgroup)—demonstrating divergence between histopathology and transcriptomic data. Further analyses of mixed subgroup via machine learning revealed a predominant mitochondrial gene signature—a trait previously known for chRCC—across all histopathologic subgroups. Additionally, ccRCC samples from mixed subgroup presented an inverse correlation of mitochondrial and angiogenesis-related genes in the TCGA and in three external validation cohorts. Moreover, mixed subgroup affiliation was associated with a highly significant shorter overall survival for patients with ccRCC—and a highly significant longer overall survival for chRCC patients.Conclusions: Pan-RCC clustering according to RNA-sequencing data revealed a distinct histology-independent subgroup characterized by strengthened mitochondrial and weakened angiogenesis-related gene signatures. Moreover, affiliation to mixed subgroup went along with a significantly shorter overall survival for ccRCC and a longer overall survival for chRCC patients. Further research could offer a therapy stratification by specifically addressing the mitochondrial metabolism of such tumors and its microenvironment.

Highlights

  • Basic and clinical research in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) mainly focuses on established histopathologic subgroups, clear cell, papillary and chromophobe RCC

  • PRCC samples did not cluster in a single subgroup, but instead in three distinct subgroups, whereas ccRCC specimen built another cluster (IV)

  • Apart from most samples clustering according to histopathology, we identified a distinct cluster containing a mixture of ccRCC, pRCC and chromophobe RCC (chRCC) samples (Figure 1B; cluster V)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Basic and clinical research in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) mainly focuses on established histopathologic subgroups, clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC) and chromophobe RCC (chRCC). Sub-categories such as clear cell papillary RCC [2] were introduced, indicating substantial greyscales between classical histopathologic subgroups. Researchers have identified characteristic signatures of ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC—thereby supporting established histopathologic classification [3,4,5]. Comprehensive pan-RCC analyses have been performed previously, the boundaries of histopathologic origin usually were not scrutinized [6, 7]. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is divided into three major histopathologic groups—clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC) and chromophobe RCC (chRCC). We performed a comprehensive re-analysis of publicly available RCC datasets from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) database, thereby combining samples from all three subgroups, for an exploratory transcriptome profiling of RCC subgroups

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call