Abstract

Abstract. One of the challenges in representing warm rain processes in global climate models (GCMs) is related to the representation of the subgrid variability of cloud properties, such as cloud water and cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC), and the effect thereof on individual precipitation processes such as autoconversion. This effect is conventionally treated by multiplying the resolved-scale warm rain process rates by an enhancement factor (Eq) which is derived from integrating over an assumed subgrid cloud water distribution. The assumed subgrid cloud distribution remains highly uncertain. In this study, we derive the subgrid variations of liquid-phase cloud properties over the tropical ocean using the satellite remote sensing products from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and investigate the corresponding enhancement factors for the GCM parameterization of autoconversion rate. We find that the conventional approach of using only subgrid variability of cloud water is insufficient and that the subgrid variability of CDNC, as well as the correlation between the two, is also important for correctly simulating the autoconversion process in GCMs. Using the MODIS data which have near-global data coverage, we find that Eq shows a strong dependence on cloud regimes due to the fact that the subgrid variability of cloud water and CDNC is regime dependent. Our analysis shows a significant increase of Eq from the stratocumulus (Sc) to cumulus (Cu) regions. Furthermore, the enhancement factor EN due to the subgrid variation of CDNC is derived from satellite observation for the first time, and results reveal several regions downwind of biomass burning aerosols (e.g., Gulf of Guinea, east coast of South Africa), air pollution (i.e., East China Sea), and active volcanos (e.g., Kilauea, Hawaii, and Ambae, Vanuatu), where the EN is comparable to or even larger than Eq, suggesting an important role of aerosol in influencing the EN. MODIS observations suggest that the subgrid variations of cloud liquid water path (LWP) and CDNC are generally positively correlated. As a result, the combined enhancement factor, including the effect of LWP and CDNC correlation, is significantly smaller than the simple product of Eq⋅EN. Given the importance of warm rain processes in understanding the Earth's system dynamics and water cycle, we conclude that more observational studies are needed to provide a better constraint on the warm rain processes in GCMs.

Highlights

  • Marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds are a strong modulator of Earth’s radiative energy budget (Klein and Hartmann, 1993; Trenberth et al, 2009)

  • Takahashi et al (2017) compared the subgrid cloud water variations simulated by a Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)-MMF model with those derived from A-Train observations and found reasonable agreement

  • One of the difficulties in general circulation models (GCMs) simulation of the warm rain parameterization is how to account for the impact of subgrid variations of cloud properties, such as cloud water and CDCN, on nonlinear precipitation processes such as autoconversion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds are a strong modulator of Earth’s radiative energy budget (Klein and Hartmann, 1993; Trenberth et al, 2009). The E for autoconversion due to subgrid LWC variation is assumed to be 3.2 in the two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization schemes by Morrison and Gettelman (2008) (MG scheme hereafter), which is employed in the widely used Community Atmosphere Model (CAM). A similar study was carried out by Bogenschutz et al (2013) using the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) CAM Both studies show that the more sophisticated subgrid parameterization scheme – Cloud Layers Unified by Binormals (CLUBB) (Golaz et al, 2002a, b; Larson et al, 2002) – lead to a better simulation of clouds in the model. Takahashi et al (2017) compared the subgrid cloud water variations simulated by a CAM-MMF model with those derived from A-Train observations and found reasonable agreement Despite these previous studies, many questions remain unanswered.

Theoretical distributions to describe subgrid cloud property variations
Impacts of subgrid cloud variations on warm rain parameterization in GCM
Data and methodology
Grid-mean and subgrid variations of liquid-phase cloud properties
Influence of subgrid variation of cloud water
Influence of subgrid variance of CDNC
The combined effect of subgrid variations of cloud water and CDNC
Findings
Summary and outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call