Abstract

Failure of resolution pathways in periodontitis is reflected in levels of specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) and SPM pathway markers but their relationship with the subgingival microbiome is unclear. This study aimed to analyze and integrate lipid mediator level, SPM receptor gene expression and subgingival microbiome data in subjects with periodontitis vs. healthy controls. The study included 13 periodontally healthy and 15 periodontitis subjects that were evaluated prior to or after non-surgical periodontal therapy. Samples of gingival tissue and subgingival plaque were collected prior to and 8 weeks after non-surgical treatment; only once in the healthy group. Metabololipidomic analysis was performed to measure levels of SPMs and other relevant lipid mediators in gingiva. qRT-PCR assessed relative gene expression (2-ΔΔCT) of known SPM receptors. 16S rRNA sequencing evaluated the relative abundance of bacterial species in subgingival plaque. Correlations between lipid mediator levels, receptor gene expression and bacterial abundance were analyzed using the Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using Latent cOmponents (DIABLO) and Sparse Partial Least Squares (SPLS) methods. Profiles of lipid mediators, receptor genes and the subgingival microbiome were distinct in the three groups. The strongest correlation existed between lipid mediator profile and subgingival microbiome profile. Multiple lipid mediators and bacterial species were highly correlated (correlation coefficient ≥0.6) in different periodontal conditions. Comparing individual correlated lipid mediators and bacterial species in periodontitis before treatment to healthy controls revealed that one bacterial species, Corynebacterium durum, and five lipid mediators, 5(S)6(R)-DiHETE, 15(S)-HEPE, 7-HDHA, 13-HDHA and 14-HDHA, were identified in both conditions. Comparing individual correlated lipid mediators and bacterial species in periodontitis before treatment to after treatment revealed that one bacterial species, Anaeroglobus geminatus, and four lipid mediators, 5(S)12(S)-DiHETE, RvD1, Maresin 1 and LTB4, were identified in both conditions. Four Selenomonas species were highly correlated with RvD1, RvE3, 5(S)12(S)-DiHETE and proinflammatory mediators in the periodontitis after treatment group. Profiles of lipid mediators, receptor gene and subgingival microbiome are associated with periodontal inflammation and correlated with each other, suggesting inflammation mediated by lipid mediators influences microbial composition in periodontitis. The role of correlated individual lipid mediators and bacterial species in periodontal inflammation have to be further studied.

Highlights

  • In the United States, around 60 million adults over 30 years of age have periodontitis (42.2%) with 7.8% having severe periodontitis [1]

  • All periodontitis subjects were diagnosed with generalized/ localized periodontitis, Stage II or III, Grade B or C (Supplementary Table 1)

  • Many studies demonstrate that shifts in the bacterial load and bacterial composition within the subgingival microbiota are correlated with periodontal conditions [30, 31]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the United States, around 60 million adults over 30 years of age have periodontitis (42.2%) with 7.8% having severe periodontitis [1]. The composition of the subgingival microbiota is associated with the inflammatory status in periodontal tissue [3]. It is hypothesized that the change of local environment induced by inflammation results in the shifts of the subgingival microbiota [4, 5]. Many studies have shown that the composition of the subgingival microbiota shifts following periodontal therapy performed to control inflammation [6, 7]. The inflamed tissues with deep periodontal pocket provide an anaerobic environment with breakdown products of tissue destruction, plasma proteins and hemoglobin as nutrients for the growth of several anaerobic gram-negative bacteria, resulting in microbiota shifts. The environment is not suitable for periodontal pathogens anymore and commensal microbiota can be reestablished in a homeostatic relationship with the host

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call