Abstract

Rubinstein bargaining game is extended to incorporate loss aversion, where the initial reference points are not zero. Under the assumption that the highest rejected proposal of the opponent last periods is regarded as the associated reference point, we investigate the effect of loss aversion and initial reference points on subgame perfect equilibrium. Firstly, a subgame perfect equilibrium is constructed. And its uniqueness is shown. Furthermore, we analyze this equilibrium with respect to initial reference points, loss aversion coefficients, and discount factor. It is shown that one benefits from his opponent’s loss aversion coefficient and his own initial reference point and is hurt by loss aversion coefficient of himself and the opponent’s initial reference point. Moreover, it is found that, for a player who has a higher level of loss aversion than the other, although this player has a higher initial reference point than the opponent, this player can(not) obtain a high share of the pie if the level of loss aversion of this player is sufficiently low (high). Finally, a relation with asymmetric Nash bargaining is established, where player’s bargaining power is negatively related to his own loss aversion and the initial reference point of the other and positively related to loss aversion of the opponent and his own initial reference point.

Highlights

  • A large number of experimental literature pieces on bargaining explore the nature of agreements and disagreements and the dynamics of bargaining

  • Under the assumption that the highest rejected proposal of the opponent last periods is regarded as the associated reference point, we investigate the effect of loss aversion and initial reference points on subgame perfect equilibrium

  • A player may transfer his expectations derived from previous opponents when he enters into a new bargaining situation with another player

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A large number of experimental literature pieces on bargaining explore the nature of agreements and disagreements and the dynamics of bargaining. Closer to this paper is Driesen et al [2]; they investigated the impact of loss aversion on the Rubinstein bargaining game based on the assumption that the initial reference points are zero and one’s reference point in the process of bargaining is regarded as the highest rejected offer of his opponent last rounds of bargaining. For Rubinstein bargaining game with loss aversion and reference dependence, where the initial reference points are not zero and the discount factor is regarded as the probability of entering a new phase of bargaining after rejecting a proposal of a player, we construct the unique subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE), and its features are shown.

Preliminaries
Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion
Analysis of the Equilibrium
Conclusions
Proof of Theorem 2
Proof of Theorem 3
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.