Abstract

ABSTRACTPurpose: To compare the subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in preeclampsia, normal pregnancy, and non-pregnant women using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). Methods: One hundred nineteen volunteers were enrolled in this prospective and comparative study. The participants were divided into three groups: group 1 (33 preeclamptic women), group 2 (46 normal pregnant), and group 3 (40 non-pregnant healthy women). The SFCT was measured by EDI-OCT. The refractive error, intraocular pressure (IOP), axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) were also measured. Medical records of pregnant women, including gestational age, maternal weight gain, weight, and proteinuria, were noted. Results: Mean SFCT of groups 1, 2, and 3 were 333.8 ± 55.3 μm (range 235-440 μm), 368.6 ± 67.6 μm (range 223-517 μm), and 334.8 ± 59.9 μm (range 197-432 μm), respectively. The mean SFCT was thicker in group 2 than that in groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.045 and p = 0.038, respectively), whereas no significant difference was seen between groups 1 and 3 (p = 1.0). In group 1, SFCT showed a negative correlation with the CCT (p = 0.009, r = -0.493). In group 2, SFCT showed a positive correlation with OPP (p = 0.030, r = 0.321) and a negative correlation with gestational age and fetal weight (p = 0.008, r = -0.387 and p = 0.011, r = -0.373, respectively). Conclusion: Our results suggested that SFCT was significantly thicker in normal pregnant women than non-pregnant women. However, SFCT values of preeclamptic women were similar to those of non-pregnant women.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.