Abstract

IntroductionCognitive symptoms from Parkinson’s disease cause severe disability and significantly limit quality of life. Little is known about mechanisms of cognitive impairment in PD, although aberrant oscillatory activity in basal ganglia-thalamo-prefrontal cortical circuits likely plays an important role. While continuous high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves motor symptoms, it is generally ineffective for cognitive symptoms. Although we lack robust treatment options for these symptoms, recent studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), applying intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), suggest beneficial effects for certain aspects of cognition, such as memory or inhibitory control. While TMS is non-invasive, its results are transient and require repeated application. Subcortical DBS targets have strong reciprocal connections with prefrontal cortex, such that iTBS through the permanently implanted lead might represent a more durable solution. Here we demonstrate safety and feasibility for delivering iTBS from the DBS electrode and explore changes in DLPFC electrophysiology.MethodsWe enrolled seven participants with medically refractory Parkinson’s disease who underwent DBS surgery targeting either the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus interna (GPi). We temporarily placed an electrocorticography strip over DLPFC through the DBS burr hole. After placement of the DBS electrode into either GPi (n = 3) or STN (n = 4), awake subjects rested quietly during iTBS (three 50-Hz pulses delivered at 5 Hz for 2 s, followed by 8 s of rest). We contrasted power spectra in DLPFC local field potentials during iTBS versus at rest, as well as between iTBS and conventional high-frequency stimulation (HFS).ResultsDominant frequencies in DLPFC at rest varied among subjects and along the subdural strip electrode, though they were generally localized in theta (3–8 Hz) and/or beta (10–30 Hz) ranges. Both iTBS and HFS were well-tolerated and imperceptible. iTBS increased theta-frequency activity more than HFS. Further, GPi stimulation resulted in significantly greater theta-power versus STN stimulation in our sample.ConclusionAcute subcortical iTBS from the DBS electrode was safe and well-tolerated. This novel stimulation pattern delivered from the GPi may increase theta-frequency power in ipsilateral DLPFC. Future studies will confirm these changes in DLPFC activity during iTBS and evaluate whether they are associated with improvements in cognitive or behavioral symptoms from PD.

Highlights

  • Cognitive symptoms from Parkinson’s disease cause severe disability and significantly limit quality of life

  • Resting dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded from all subjects (n = 8 hemispheres), and we delivered high-frequency stimulation (HFS) from the deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode in four participants (n = 4 hemispheres), 4-Hz continuous stimulation in 1 participant (n = 1 hemisphere) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) in six participants (n = 7 hemispheres)

  • We delivered iTBS from the same bipolar contact pair, and at the same current and pulse width, that was used for HFS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cognitive symptoms from Parkinson’s disease cause severe disability and significantly limit quality of life. While continuous high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves motor symptoms, it is generally ineffective for cognitive symptoms. We lack robust treatment options for these symptoms, recent studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), applying intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), suggest beneficial effects for certain aspects of cognition, such as memory or inhibitory control. Effective high-frequency DBS at subcortical targets for movement disorders [subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus interna (GPi)] results in betaoscillation desynchronization and reduced phase-amplitude coupling (Asanuma et al, 2006; De Hemptinne et al, 2015). Much less is known about possible interactions with prefrontal cortical areas using novel parameters If these interactions occur, it would serve as a foundation for optimization of next-generation devices aimed at improving motor symptoms, and cognitive effects of the disease as well

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call