Subclassification of Bethesda Atypical and Follicular Neoplasm Categories According to Nuclear and Architectural Atypia Improves Discrimination of Thyroid Malignancy Risk.

Abstract

Although The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has provided clinicians with a standardized classification scheme for the diagnosis of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens, the indeterminate categories of Bethesda III (B3)-atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS)-and Bethesda IV (B4)-follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN)-continue to pose challenges with regards to ideal diagnostic and therapeutic management. Having previously demonstrated the presence of nuclear atypia as a high-risk subgroup in B3, the objective of this study was to evaluate the malignancy rates in the B4 subgroup with nuclear atypia. A retrospective review of all thyroid FNACs diagnosed as B4 (FN/SFN) between 2008 and 2015 was conducted at a tertiary referral center in Singapore. Data on patient demographics, sonographic features, and final histological diagnosis were collected. This was compared to data from a previous analysis on all nodules diagnosed as B3 (AUS/FLUS) over a similar period. A total of 137/309 (44.3%) and 88/111 (79.3%) FNACs diagnosed as B3 and B4, respectively, underwent surgical excision yielding final histopathological diagnoses. The malignancy rate of B4 was 31/88 (35.2%) compared to B3, which was 37/137 (27.0%). Subclassification based on the presence of architectural versus nuclear atypia showed significantly higher malignancy rates in B4 nodules with nuclear atypia (21.8% vs. 57.6%; p < 0.01). These findings corroborate previous results within the B3 category (malignancy rate of 14.7% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.01). The only sonographic features predictive of malignancy were the presence of macrocalcifications in B4 compared to irregularity of margins in B3. The presence of nuclear atypia identifies subgroups with significant differential malignancy risks within both the B3 and B4 categories. This supports the notion that subclassification is a useful risk stratification tool that can guide diagnostic and therapeutic management of indeterminate thyroid nodules with heterogenous risk profiles.