Abstract
Gene duplication is the primary source of new genes and novel functions. Over the course of evolution, many duplicate genes lose their function and are eventually removed by deletion. However, some duplicates have persisted and evolved diverse functions. A particular challenge is to understand how this diversity arises and whether positive selection plays a role. In this study, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of the class III peroxidase (PRX) genes from the Populus trichocarpa genome. PRXs are plant-specific enzymes that play important roles in cell wall metabolism and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. We found that two large tandem-arrayed clusters of PRXs evolved from an ancestral cell wall type PRX to vacuole type, followed by tandem duplications and subsequent functional specification. Substitution models identified seven positively selected sites in the vacuole PRXs. These positively selected sites showed significant effects on the biochemical functions of the enzymes. We also found that positive selection acts more frequently on residues adjacent to, rather than directly at, a critical active site of the enzyme, and on flexible regions rather than on rigid structural elements of the protein. Our study provides new insights into the adaptive molecular evolution of plant enzyme families.
Highlights
Gene duplication is an important mechanism for the evolution of novel gene function
Protein subcellular localization, statistical tests for positive selection, site-directed mutagenesis, and enzyme functional assays of ancestral, current, and mutant proteins, this study revealed that protein subcellular relocalization and positive selection likely have played important roles in the retention of duplicate genes
We found 43 PRX fragments from the Populus genome, indicating that massive gene losses have occurred in this gene family
Summary
Gene duplication is an important mechanism for the evolution of novel gene function. The neofunctionalization model has been proposed as an important process driving the retention of duplicated genes by evolving novel functions (Byrne and Wolfe, 2007; Sakuma et al, 2013). This model cannot satisfactorily explain how a duplicate gene can escape the load of deleterious mutations that would probably accumulate before enough beneficial mutations could confer a new function (Byun-McKay and Geeta, 2007). The lack of appropriate functional assays has generally hindered attempts to elucidate the molecular mechanisms and effects of positive selection on the retention and divergence of duplicate genes
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.