Abstract
It is well known that sub-surface nano-objects can be detected by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) with either sub-surface stress or electric fields, by using dynamic AFM methods such as Contact Resonance AFM (CR-AFM) or 2nd-harmonic Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM), respectively. However, little is understood regarding the relative differences between the two methods. We present a head-to-head comparison between the sub-surface imaging capabilities of these two methods through experiments and computational models based on finite element analysis (FEA). High resolution subsurface images are obtained using both techniques, from the same area of a polymer composite film containing single-walled carbon nanotube networks embedded in a polyimide matrix. The results are used to interpret quantitatively the observables from CR-AFM and KPFM, with a particular focus on the depth sensitivity and lateral resolution. The depth of the buried carbon nanotube bundles estimated by combining experiments and FEA is found to be in good agreement between the two methods.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.