Abstract

Objectives: We investigated factors affecting the success of percutaneous T-stenting and endoscopic Y-stenting in advanced hilar malignancy. Characteristics of clinical and radiologic findings that make difficult for endoscopic Ystenting were analyzed. Methods: A total of 101 patients with inoperable advanced hilar tumors were retrospectively reviewed. We divided our patients into three groups as follows: Group I(50 patients) = patients with initial successful endoscopic Y-stenting, Group II(19 patients) = patients with unsuccessful initial endoscopic Y-stenting but successful following percutaneous T-stenting. Group III(32 patients)= patients with successful initial percutaneous T-stenting without endoscopic Ystenting trial. Radiological characteristics of the lesion, procedure related complications, duration of stent patency, overall survival were evaluated and compared retrospectively between Group I and Group II. Results: There were no significant differences among the two groups in baseline clinical characteristics, procedure related complications, duration of stent patency and overall survival. In Group II, complete obstruction and bismuth type IV tumor was more common than Group I significantly. (p<0.05). Successful palliation of cholestasis was achieved in 51 patients (51/51, 100%) by percutaneous T-stenting which was significantly higher than endoscopic Y-stenting. (50/69, 72.4%) (p <0.05) Conclusions: Percutaneous T-stenting may be chosen for initial biliary drainage in patients who have complete obstruction and bismuth type IV tumor in that it has higher success rate without increasing procedure-related complication when compared with endoscopic Y-stenting.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.