SU‐F‐T‐186: A Treatment Planning Study of Normal Tissue Sparing with Robustness Optimized IMPT, 4Pi IMRT, and VMAT for Head and Neck Cases

Abstract

Purpose:We performed a retrospective dosimetric comparison study between the robustness optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (RO‐IMPT), volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and the non‐coplanar 4? intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). These methods represent the most advanced radiation treatment methods clinically available. We compare their dosimetric performance for head and neck cancer treatments with special focus on the OAR sparing near the tumor volumes.Methods:A total of 11 head and neck cases, which include 10 recurrent cases and one bilateral case, were selected for the study. Different dose levels were prescribed to tumor target depending on disease and location. Three treatment plans were created on commercial TPS systems for a novel noncoplanar 4π method (20 beams), VMAT, and RO‐IMPT technique (maximum 4 fields). The maximum patient positioning error was set to 3 mm and the maximum proton range uncertainty was set to 3% for the robustness optimization. Line dose profiles were investigated for OARs close to tumor volumes.Results:All three techniques achieved 98% coverage of the CTV target and most photon plans had less than 110% of the hot spots. The RO‐IMPT plans show superior tumor dose homogeneity than 4? and VMAT plans. Although RO‐IMPT has greater R50 dose spillage to the surrounding normal tissue than 4π and VMAT, the RO‐IMPT plans demonstrate better or comparable OAR (parotid, mandible, carotid, oral cavity, pharynx, and etc.) sparing for structures closely abutting tumor targets.Conclusion:The RO‐IMPT's ability of OAR sparing is benchmarked against the C‐arm linac based non‐coplanar 4π technique and the standard VMAT method. RO‐IMPT consistently shows better or comparable OAR sparing even for tissue structures closely abutting treatment target volume. RO‐IMPT further reduces treatment uncertainty associated with proton therapy and delivers robust treatment plans to both unilateral and bilateral head and neck cancer patients with desirable treatment time.