SU‐E‐T‐480: IMRT/VMAT QA Employing a High Resolution Measurement Array: Initial Experience and Limitations

Abstract

Purpose:Patient specific QA for IMRT/VMAT is time‐consuming. A high resolution ionization chamber array was employed which rotates synchronously with the gantry. Commissioning, initial experience and limitations of this measurement technique will be discussed.Methods:A high resolution ionization chamber array, Octavius1500 (PTW‐Freiburg, Germany), was employed with the Octavius4D rotating cylindrical phantom. Measured plans are reconstructed into a 3D dose distribution using measured depth dose curves (Verisoft 6.0 PTW‐Freiburg). Plans of varying complexity were selected from our patient collective treated at a TrueBeam 1.5 linac (Varian Medical Systems) with HD120 MLC (VMS). Cross‐calibration was performed using a thimble chamber (30016, PTW‐Freiburg) placed within the cylindrical phantom (SSD 840mm, SCD 1000mm). All dose distributions were recalculated using a 1.5mm dose grid (Eclipse, AAA10.0.28/Acuros10.0.28, VMS) using a virtual homogeneous cylindrical phantom provided by the array manufacturer (density 1.016 gcm‐3). All analyses were performed using Verisoft and compared to routine QA analysis (Octavius729 with octagonal phantom) results.Results:Depth dose curves from 1cm × 1cm to 26cm × 26cm were measured for 3D dose calculation commissioning in Verisoft 6.0. Excellent agreement was observed between TPS PDD and PDD derived from the Octavius1500 array measurement. For highly modulated plans the overall 3D gamma (2.0mm, 3.0%) ranged between 91.3% to 96.9%. The Octavius729 (2D) array results ranged from 97.9 to 100.0% for PTVs.Conclusion:The Octavius1500 and 4D cylindrical phantom provides an integrated QA solution. Complex VMAT plans, comprising multiple PTVs, can be verified with a single (rotating) measurement of all arcs. Hitherto two measurements (horizontal and vertical) had to be performed per PTV. Overall the results are good. However, some refinement may need to be made to the reconstruction. Further work needs to be done to determine appropriate action levels for routine analysis.