Abstract

Purpose:Inspired by compressive sensing, sparsity regularized iterative reconstruction method has been extensively studied. However, its utility pertinent to multislice helical 4D CT for radiotherapy with respect to imaging quality, dose, and time has not been thoroughly addressed. As the beginning of such an investigation, this work carries out the initial comparison of reconstructed imaging quality between sparsity regularized iterative method and analytic method through static phantom studies using a state‐of‐art 128‐channel multi‐slice Siemens helical CT scanner.Methods:In our iterative method, tensor framelet (TF) is chosen as the regularization method for its superior performance from total variation regularization in terms of reduced piecewise‐constant artifacts and improved imaging quality that has been demonstrated in our prior work. On the other hand, X‐ray transforms and its adjoints are computed on‐the‐fly through GPU implementation using our previous developed fast parallel algorithms with O(1) complexity per computing thread. For comparison, both FDK (approximate analytic method) and Katsevich algorithm (exact analytic method) are used for multislice helical CT image reconstruction.Results:The phantom experimental data with different imaging doses were acquired using a state‐of‐art 128‐channel multi‐slice Siemens helical CT scanner. The reconstructed image quality was compared between TF‐based iterative method, FDK and Katsevich algorithm with the quantitative analysis for characterizing signal‐to‐noise ratio, image contrast, and spatial resolution of high‐contrast and low‐contrast objects.Conclusion:The experimental results suggest that our tensor framelet regularized iterative reconstruction algorithm improves the helical CT imaging quality from FDK and Katsevich algorithm for static experimental phantom studies that have been performed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.