Abstract
Purpose: This paper examines the associative and causal relationship between changes in the implied volatility index (VIX) and stock market returns, with data from 15 countries representing both developed and emerging economies.1 We also examine the dynamic variation, if any in the nature of the relationship across bull and bear market swings in these markets. Design/Methodology/Approach: We use daily time series data between January 2013 to July 2019, on VIX and stock index from these countries and employ regression and causality models to explore the nature of the relationship between VIX and stock market movements. We also explore differential patterns, if any, across the countries and bull and bear market cycles in each of these countries. We substantiate our results from the main analysis using a series of robustness tests. Findings: For most countries, we find strong evidence of a negative and asymmetric relationship between the stock market and VIX movement, irrespective of the bear and bull market cycles. We also find that this relation is asymmetric in nature i.e. volatility spikes are more in market downturns than during market upswings. We find strong evidence of the “leverage hypothesis” explaining this asymmetric relation for all countries across all market cycles. We also find weak evidence of reverse causality i.e VIX changes to market movements as per the “volatility feedback hypothesis” holding during bear periods only in developed countries. We suspect that two important pre-conditions of volatility feedback hypothesis to hold, namely volatility persistence and contemporaneous positive volatility return relation might not be holding. We do not find any significant changes in these patterns across bull and bear market cycles. Value: These results indicate that investors can effectively use signals imminent in VIX movements, to determine potential entry and exit points both in emerging as well as developed markets. This should provide them an additional tool in addition to standard analysis approaches before allocating resources in a particular market.
Highlights
This paper examines the association of “implied volatility indices” (VIX ) and stock market returns, in 15 countries representing developed and emerging markets under bull and bear market conditions
We find strong evidence of leverage hypothesis holding i.e causality flowing from the market return to volatility index (VIX), for all countries, independent of market cycles
With respect to our hypothesis 3 above, we find strong evidence of causal flow from market movements to VIX i.e. leverage hypothesis holds for our overall data
Summary
This paper examines the association of “implied volatility indices” (VIX ) and stock market returns, in 15 countries representing developed and emerging markets under bull and bear market conditions. Returns and volatility are typically found to be negatively related and this relation is asymmetric in nature i.e. more prominent for negative returns (Bekaert & Wu, 2000; Black, 1976; Christie, 1982; French, Schwert, & Stambaugh, 1987) The nature of this relation is expected to change across different market cycles (bull and bear) and more so across different markets with different levels of maturity (emerging and developed). Given the inadequacy of even the most advanced models to truly reflect market sentiment and investor expectations regarding future economic fundamentals, using only historical data, (Han, Kutan, & Ryu, 2015), an alternative class of volatility estimation models is often proposed. VIX estimates are believed to be forward-looking and having clear advantages over historical volatilities in capturing market conditions and forecasting future states (Giot & Laurent, 2007; Ryu, 2012)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.