Abstract
Software development nowadays is heavily based on libraries, frameworks and their proposed Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). However, due to challenges such as the complexity and the lack of documentation, these APIs may introduce various obstacles for developers and common defects in software systems. To resolve these issues, developers usually utilize Question and Answer (Q&A) websites such as Stack Overflow by asking their questions and finding proper solutions for their problems on APIs. Therefore, these websites have become inevitable sources of knowledge for developers, which is also known as the crowd knowledge.However, the relation of this knowledge to the software quality has never been adequately explored before. In this paper, we study whether using APIs which are challenging according to the discussions of the Stack Overflow is related to code quality defined in terms of post-release defects. To this purpose, we define the concept of challenge of an API, which denotes how much the API is discussed in high-quality posts on Stack Overflow. Then, using this concept, we propose a set of products and process metrics. We empirically study the statistical correlation between our metrics and post-release defects as well as added explanatory and predictive power to traditional models through a case study on five open source projects including Spring, Elastic Search, Jenkins, K-8 Mail Android Client, and OwnCloud Android client.Our findings reveal that our metrics have a positive correlation with post-release defects which is comparable to known high-performance traditional process metrics, such as code churn and number of pre-release defects. Furthermore, our proposed metrics can provide additional explanatory and predictive power for software quality when added to the models based on existing products and process metrics. Our results suggest that software developers should consider allocating more resources on reviewing and improving external API usages to prevent further defects.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
