Studying Methods, Not Ethics: Exploring the Methodological Character of Administrative Ethics Research

Abstract

The use of scientific methods is no longer restricted to science. Knowledge of social science methods has proliferated beyond scientists to public sector organizations of all types. Nevertheless, the methodology of administrative ethics research is dominated by descriptive hypotheses, small- and medium-n analysis, single-country/single-shot research designs, and document analysis as data-collection instruments. This study shows the blind spots of predictive propositions, comparative research designs, interviews, and observations as data-collection instruments or triangulation. Against the background of the evolution of the discipline, as well as the specific topography of the field, it is argued that administrative ethics research has room to unleash its full methodological power for solving, describing, exploring, explaining, and predicting the major problems of ethics research. The theme addressed has a direct bearing for scientists and decision-makers in the public sector. Research and policymaking could both profit from a new methodological pluralism.