Abstract

Implicit learning is usually studied through individual performance on a single task, with the most common tasks being the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task, the Dynamic System Control (DSC) task, and Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL). Few attempts have been made to compare performance across different implicit learning tasks within the same study. The current study was designed to explore the relationship between performance on the DSC Sugar factory task and the Alternating Serial Reaction Time (ASRT) task. We also addressed another limitation of traditional implicit learning experiments, namely that implicit learning is usually studied in laboratory settings over a restricted time span lasting for less than an hour. In everyday situations, implicit learning is assumed to involve a gradual accumulation of knowledge across several learning episodes over a longer time span. One way to increase the ecological validity of implicit learning experiments could be to present the learning material repeatedly across shorter test sessions. This can most easily be done by using a web-based setup in which participants can access the material from home. We therefore created an online web-based system for measuring implicit learning that could be administered in either single or multiple sessions. Participants (n = 66) were assigned to either a single session or a multiple session condition. Learning occurred on both tasks, and awareness measures suggested that acquired knowledge was not fully conscious on either of the tasks. Learning and the degree of conscious awareness of the learned regularities were compared across conditions and tasks. On the DSC task, performance was not affected by whether learning had taken place in one or over multiple sessions. On the ASRT task, RT improvement across blocks was larger in the multiple-session condition. Learning in the two tasks was not related.

Highlights

  • Implicit learning can broadly be defined as learning that occurs without full conscious awareness of the regularities contained in the learned material itself and/or that learning has occurred (Berry and Dienes, 1993)

  • To conduct the study in a way that could be administered over several sessions, while being experienced as more engaging and with the additional benefit of being less time consuming for the participants, we developed an online set of tasks that participants could take part in from their own home

  • Exclusion of participants from analyses was done independently for the sugar factory task and the Alternating Serial Reaction Time (ASRT) task, and the intersection of non-excluded participants were used for the cross-task comparison

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Implicit learning can broadly be defined as learning that occurs without full conscious awareness of the regularities contained in the learned material itself and/or that learning has occurred (Berry and Dienes, 1993). Cleeremans et al (1998) described the common structure of paradigms for studying implicit learning as involving three components. Participants are exposed to a complex rulegoverned regularity where learning is incidental. They perform a task which includes a measure that can quantify the degree to which the regularity has been learned. The most common experimental paradigms used to study implicit learning are: (1) The AGL task (Reber, 1967), (2) The SRT task (Nissen and Bullemer, 1987), and (3) The DSC task (Berry and Broadbent, 1984). Though similar in principal structure, the experimental setup, manipulations, and measures used to infer implicit learning differ across these paradigms. We briefly present the SRT and DSC tasks, since varieties of these two tasks were applied in the current study

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call