Abstract

BackgroundThe effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs is challenged by suboptimal participation and coverage. Offering cervico-vaginal self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing (HPV self-sampling) to non-participants can increase screening participation. However, the effect varies substantially among studies, especially depending on the approach used to offer HPV self-sampling. The present trial evaluates the effect on participation in an organized screening program of a HPV self-sampling kit mailed directly to the home of the woman or mailed to the woman’s home on demand only, compared with the standard second reminder for regular screening.Methods/designThe CHOiCE trial is a parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label trial. It will include 9327 women aged 30–64 years who are living in the Central Denmark Region and who have not participated in cervical cancer screening after an invitation and one reminder. The women will be equally randomized into three arms: 1) Directly mailed a second reminder including a HPV self-sampling kit; 2) Mailed a second reminder offering a HPV self-sampling kit, to be ordered by e-mail, text message, phone, or through a webpage; and 3) Mailed a second reminder for a practitioner-collected sample (control group). The primary outcome will be the proportion of women in the intervention groups who participate by returning their HPV self-sampling kit or have a practitioner-collected sample compared with the proportion of women who have a practitioner-collected sample in the control group at 90 and 180 days after mail out of the second reminders. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses will be performed. The secondary outcome will be the proportion of women with a positive HPV self-collected sample who attend follow-up testing at 30, 60, or 90 days after mail out of the results.DiscussionThe CHOiCE trial will provide strong and important evidence allowing us to determine if and how HPV self-sampling can be used to increase participation in cervical cancer screening. This trial therefore has the potential to improve prevention and reduce the number of deaths caused by cervical cancer.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials NCT02680262. Registered 10 February 2016.

Highlights

  • The effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs is challenged by suboptimal participation and coverage

  • In the efforts to reduce barriers to cervical cancer screening and to increase participation, we will conduct a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial to evaluate the effect of two different approaches for offering HPV self-sampling to women who did not participate in the cervical cancer screening program despite an invitation and one reminder

  • Women who have not participated in cervical cancer screening after an invitation and one reminder will be randomly allocated to one of the following three arms (Fig. 1): 1) mailing of a modified second reminder including the self-sampling kit

Read more

Summary

Discussion

The Danish Cervical Cancer Screening Program is challenged by a suboptimal participation rate [9]. The DPDB is a nationwide database that holds detailed, highly valid records on all pathology specimens, including cervical cytologies and HPV tests of provider-collected and self-collected samples from all Danish pathology departments [28, 29]. Another strength of the study is that the self-sampling procedure is embedded directly into a population-based, well-run organized screening program. As the trial is an effectiveness study nested into a routine screening program, the findings will provide strong and important evidence allowing us to determine if and how HPV self-sampling can be used to improve screening participation. Author details 1Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930 Randers, NØ, Denmark. 2Department of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. 4Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. 5Department of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Østervangsvej 48, 8930 Randers, NØ, Denmark. 6Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark

Background
Methods
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call